Privatized Prisons in the US Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Privatized Prisons in the US - Research Paper ExampleThis give-and-take will look into the advantages and disadvantages regarding both systems. The private prison house experiment has lasted nearly three decades in the U.S., massive enough to make conclusions about the effectiveness and overall impact on state and local governments. Privatized prisons brook experienced dynamic growth in recent years but the concept, at least in part, has been around for a long time. During the 1800s, some states entered into contracts with private groups to lease inmate labor. Leasing captives occurred on a plumb routine basis but the system and the inmates, as might be expected, were quash to widespread abuses. Because of this, the prisoner lease system came to an end in 1920s during the Progressive Era. Until deep the fast growth in the prison and jail populations generated extraordinary opportunities for entrepreneurs to own and operate prisons beginning in the 1980s. The concept of privat ization became a upshot of public discussion in the mid-1980s, when the newly formed Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) proposed to the State of Tennessees to operate its entire prison system. The State paid CCA $250 million dollars on a 99-year deal. In return, CCA would gild the states prisoners for an annually negotiated per-inmate payment. In addition, CCA would insure that the prisons it operated would meet the criterion establish by the same(p) federal judge who had earlier determined that the states prison system violated of the U.S. governing body referable to the sub-standard conditions of confinement. (McDonald, et al. 1998) CCAs relationship with Tennessee started the privatization boom that spread across the nation. Other states were experiencing similar issues with overcrowding and the problems associated with it therefore capable to hand the operation of prisons over to an outside entity. Many have questioned the legality of privatization, arguing the practi ce does not square with e Constitution. While the legality of governments assigning correctional authority to private corporations was broadly argued in the 1980s, it now seems that opposition to prison privatization, at least on a constitutional basis, has no merit. Unless a government has positively no convincing statutory authority for entering into contracts with private prison companies, courts will be hesitant to nullify those contacts on grounds of delegation. Only delegated rulemaking and adjudication functions that directly purport to exercise a government power are deemed to require special constitutional due process safeguards and to be subject to heightened judicial scrutiny. (McDonald, et al. 1998) No clear case law has been developed to define with precision how general due process standards will be applied to private prisons. The U.S. has the higher incarceration rate than any early(a) in the world and is paying more than $3 billion a year to the private prison indus try. These two facts are interrelated in an intentional and disturbing way. According to a instruct recently completed by the Justice Policy Institute (JPI), Americas two largest private prison corporations, GEO Group and CCA collectively pocketed annual incomes of $2.9 billion in 2010. The JPI issued a report based on the study called Gaming the System. It reveals that during the past decade, the number of prisoners housed in private